Subscribe to our free 
bi- monthly 
e-mail newsletter
 

ACORD
Dean Bradley House,  
52 Horseferry Road
London SW1 2AF
England

Registered Charity: 283302

ACORD 2000 Annual Report

ACORD's Livelihoods work: ensuring sustainability

Overview
Achievements in our Livelihoods Work


Overview
Supporting communities in their efforts to achieve sustainable livelihoods through both material and non-material interventions has always been at the core of our work. As an early adopter of participatory planning and implementation for interventions in pastoralism, food security and microfinance, the increasing focus on livelihoods by other development agencies mirrors our experience in the remote and marginalised areas in which we work.

Central to the evolution of our interventions, particularly as many are relatively long-term, are the connections we make between the alleviation of material poverty, building the capacities of community-based organisations (CBOs), and initiating and strengthening dialogue with other development partners, such as local Government agencies responsible for the delivery of local services. Our long-term presence in many marginalised and conflict-affected areas has enabled strong relationships of trust to be established that greatly assist in this dialogue process.

Our pastoralism approaches are primarily implemented in Ethiopia, Sudan, Angola and Mali. With animal health and livestock management as the key issue, diversification of income generating and livelihood strategies to improve the standard of living and coping mechanisms has become particularly important in the remote areas where we work.

Our Food security interventions generally focus on sustainable agriculture and are widespread in our programming, covering activities in most of the countries where we work.

Microfinance has been our third key strategy to strengthen sustainable livelihoods. An important feature of our microfinance approach has been the use of participatory methodologies that result in the development of credit schemes that reflect local economic, social and cultural circumstances.

Our thematic approach to livelihoods not only focuses on the direct alleviation of poverty, but includes addressing the factors that are a priority in the environments in which partner communities and clients live and operate. In practice this means establishing a dialogue and working with local stakeholders and local Government structures. It can also mean raising sensitive issues that are perceived to have less space for change such as natural resource rights and gender. Judging this space is never easy, but our position as an implementing agency with locally recruited staff at the programme level greatly assists this process.

Achievements in our Livelihoods Work

Pastoralism

  • Our livelihoods approach in the Red Sea Hills of Sudan included addressing priorities of migrants from the programme area that had moved in search of seasonal work to the urban areas of Port Sudan, a coping mechanism that is particularly important in drought years.
  • Key to the success of our work in promoting animal health and productivity through paravet training and support in Gambella, was addressing the problems of conflicts over resources between Nuer communities.
  • A key part of our work in Mali is our involvement in the formulation of the pastoralists' charter to improve the protection of pastoralist rights and to support research in natural resources.
  • Our work with pastoralists in Gambos improved the health of both the pastoralists and their livestock and the pastoralists now appreciate the value of vaccinating their livestock. We also continued to work closely with local groups who will eventually take over the activities.
  • We established a sub-regional pastoralist programme in West Africa, combining Mali, Mauritania and Burkina Faso's methodological approach to pastoralist communities.

Sustainable Livelihoods (Food Secuirty)

  • In Somalia, despite widespread lawlessness and unpredictable outbreaks of conflict, we managed to increase food production by 15% by increasing irrigation land from 3,374 hectares to 9,824 hectares. This has resulted in a sustained improvement in household incomes.
  • In Burundi, more than 2000 beneficiaries who were allocated land were able to cultivate it with high market-value produce. This afforded them some protection from the effects of the drought which gripped the region, as well enable them to start addressing the educational needs of their children.
  • Our approach in Biharamulo that integrates food security with environmental activities and conservation at village level was adopted by local Government at the district level.
  • Our support in rehabilitating flood-affected communities in Mozambique and providing post-conflict support to displaced households in Eritrea enabled communities to resume agricultural activities and to rebuild their lives.
  • Sustainable agriculture which continued to be central to our farmer support and training approach in Uganda reduced reliance on expensive chemicals and enhanced the environmental sustainability of farming systems.
  • Most of the southern Sudanese refugees and nationals we supported in Adjumani succeeded in produced most of their own food requirements in 2000. Over the years, agriculture has become their way of life and the mainstay of their livelihoods in the settlements.
  • The food security activities of the Gambella programme were successfully handed over to the Ministry of Agriculture.

Microfinance

  • Despite extremely difficult conditions, the independently owned and controlled credit and savings systems we helped to establish in Eritrea arranged loans to over 6000 people (37% women) in 276 villages. This indirectly benefited 30,000 people. Plans were also made to initiate similar activities in the Central Zone.
  • A sample survey of 150 clients in Eritrea showed that 83% of agricultural loans had led to increased food security and income and that 95% of trade loans had led to sustained increase in profitability of their enterprises.
  • Our microfinance work in Eritrea has attracted organisations such as the UN, DANIDA, and the British Council to work closely with us and to use our approach and structure to channel assistance to those affected by the war.
  • Seventy-five percent of the beneficiaries of our microfinance programme in Kassala stated that their lives had improved since receiving microcredit loans, and that their households incomes had increased which enabled them to meet their families' needs and even to save money.
  • Developing a village banking structure in Mali and Eritrea was central to the facilitation of institutions that will continue to provide investment to beneficiaries once our programmes close. In Port Sudan, a local NGO was successfully established for the same purpose towards the end of the year.
  • Introducing microfinance activities to existing traditional CBOs in Ethiopia led to a national advocacy network across four programmes. This helped to raise the profile of CBOs and of a diversified livelihoods approach that not only focuses on credit and savings, but also on social development activities such as gender awareness, HIV/AIDS issues and urban services. Similar urban credit approaches were adopted in Mwanza.
  • We set up a regional microfinance network in the Horn to share experiences across our six microfinance programmes.
  • We undertook research in collaboration with HelpAge International on access to credit for older people.
  • The Islamic mode of credit was used in Sudan and Mauritania, reflecting both client preference and local cultural norms.
  • We initiated a new strategy in Rwanda to support small-scale credit and savings units in rural areas. These units have grown into competitive structures rivalling established financial institutions. Priority was given to villagers torn by ethnic hatred who are now confronted with the new challenge of ‘cohabitation’.


Return to 2000 Annual Report Index

Return to top