|
|
In
Acord
Newsletter
Issue 1: February 2001 Article 5: Our dilemma in Liberia We are currently facing a dilemma in Liberia. The current political climate and the looting of the ACORD office in early October is making it extremely difficult for us to maintain a presence in Lofa County. Our alternative would be to work in neighbouring countries, observing the situation from afar. Such a move would result in our abandoning the people of Lofa during their hour of need and would fly in the face of our stated mission and values says MARY MUSIRIKA, ACORD's Programme Co-ordinator in Liberia. ACORD's solidarity with the poor in Liberia's Lofa County is posing a major challenge. Having recently returned from Guinea to which they fled during a seven-year conflict, the people of Lofa are still traumatised, there is weak social organisation, the ethnic tensions are high and violence continues. UN agencies are not operating in the area, having declared it a Phase IV "pack your bags and go" zone. Indeed, it is only organisations like ours, with a declared solidarity with the poor, that have chosen to continue operating in the area. However, following the looting of ACORD's premises in early October, it is unlikely that we can remain in Lofa for very much longer. Our alternative - to work in neighbouring countries while observing the situation in Lofa - would mean that we would no longer be working alongside the most marginalised and vulnerable people, most of whom are in Lofa. Furthermore, Liberia is at war with most of its neighbours. How far can we stretch our good will in a place where there is no law and order? How far are we prepared to go? A history of skewed
development The violence continues Violent opposition continues and the victims of this violence are mainly the citizens of Lofa County, which borders Guinea to the north and northwest, and where we currently have our only Liberian programme. Lofa County has been the focus of much of the recent conflict as it is home to the Mandingos, one of the clans seen to be favoured by Samuel Doe, an indigenous Krahn, who instigated a violent overthrow of the Government of the True Whigs, which had ruled Liberia for over a century. The coup was welcomed by most of the people of the interior who had felt excluded and marginalised. In the eyes of the Government, the rebels and the Mandingos are one and the same as most of them fled to Guinea during the seven-year war and did not return. In addition, ULIMOK, a fighting faction during the war, was seen to derive its support from the Mandingos. Most of its leaders are still in exile in Guinea. ACORD's role in Liberia Indeed, the security situation there continues to have serious repercussions for Liberia, and has resulted in a dramatic cut in foreign assistance and foreign investment. This has had dire consequences for ordinary people and has reduced assistance for education and health, the two basic services that are of greatest concern to them. Furthermore, services and development of infrastructure have been centred on Monrovia and other coastal towns, to the exclusion of the hinterland. At present, efforts at national reconciliation and peace building have to be vetted by the Government. There is no free press and the opposition is very weak and intimidated. The role of NGOs What future for ACORD? Our current dilemma must challenge us to find a compromise so we do not abandon the Liberian people in their hour of need. EDITORIAL COMMENT: Liberia has been given two months to convince the UN that it has stopped supporting rebels in Sierra Leone. If it fails to do so, the UN will impose sanctions. If this occurs, the people of Liberia will need support more than ever.
|